Reviewing A Park Off An Magazine Article

Discussion in 'Destinations and RV Parks' started by westernrvparkowner, May 26, 2009.

  1. westernrvparkowner

    westernrvparkowner
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    76
    There was a review posted recently about Tampa East RV resort. The poster apparently has never laid eyes on the park or even attempted to stay there. They posted a review based on an article in Highways magazine. Should this be acceptable? Can I review a park because I read about it? How about reviewing it and giving it a 10 because it looked nice in the ad or on it's website? I am not questioning Highways Magazine, I am sure they are a good source, but how many times are there comments in these postings that say "I Don't understand how Woodalls or Trailer Life rated it so high". I thought that this site was for reviews of parks that the reviewer had some connection to. I don't think it should be for posting reviews where the only information the poster had was from a second hand source.
     
  2. abbygolden

    abbygolden
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    1
    I agree. If one hasn't stayed overnight, they shouldn't rate a campground. The exception to this - and even I don't think it should be allowed - is if one specifically states they haven't been there and the rating is because the place is closed or some other unusual reason.
     
  3. Texasrvers

    Texasrvers
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    9,360
    Likes Received:
    756
    I agree. However, I think it would be appropriate to post the "review" comments in the forum.
     
  4. gilda

    gilda
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    deleted
     
  5. Texasrvers

    Texasrvers
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    9,360
    Likes Received:
    756
    QUOTE(gilda @ May 26 2009, 04:51 PM) [snapback]16624[/snapback]

    From a magazine article???




    All I'm saying is that the comments that were submitted as a review would have been OK in a forum topic. I don't think a review should have been submitted based solely on a magazine article. However, if I recall correctly the reviewer talked about having trouble reaching the park and somthing else I can't remember. I see no problem with reporting these things in the forum.
     
  6. westernrvparkowner

    westernrvparkowner
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    76
    The administrator removed the post. Job well done. I believe that such actions by the administrator keeps this site relevant and a great resource. Three cheers.
     
  7. John Blue

    John Blue
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,172
    Likes Received:
    2
    Sorry to say this but the information is more or less true. We live near this place. I agree removing review was the correct action to take.
     
  8. nedmtnman

    nedmtnman
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    367
    Likes Received:
    24
    What makes this web site so good is the reviews by the campers that have STAYED there. I probably use this site more than trailer life. I do however take each negative review with a grain of salt. Usually there are several reviews of a campground and I can get a "feel" for the place.
     

Share This Page