This same issue has been discussed previously on several occasions on the website. There are proponents and opponents of the ‘didn’t stay’ review in previous threads as well as this current one. I put my two cents worth into the previous discussions so I won’t repeat that particular opinion. Regardless of which way you lean on the issue, I really do appreciate fellow RVers who wish to look out for my welfare. But with all due respect, I have the capability to recognize a dump of a campground when I actually see one. I suspect that most everyone does also. It’s the same concept as not wanting to walk or drive on a particular street in an area where I do not feel comfortable. Kcmoedoekcmoedoe comments make the most sense…”posting a review where you have not stayed is only appropriate when your review gives some insight into the actual park.” “I would also prefer reviews that limit the personal comments regarding park…”
